AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2039 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 23.49 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 13 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 23.49 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8082 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP108 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 13 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 150 | 152 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 31.32 GFLOPS (1:24) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | 751.6 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 23.49 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 1800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 200 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 40.10 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |