AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 2039 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 798 vs 746
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2039 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 vs 746 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1920 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 7969
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 34489
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 7969 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 34489 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 798 | 746 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7969 | 14119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34489 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 24 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 7 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 159 | 161 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 12 | |
| Core clock speed | 2039 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |