AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 2039 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 175 Watt
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 2 July 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2176 vs 768
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 855 vs 770
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16529 vs 8082
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87370 vs 34464
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2176 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 855 vs 770 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16529 vs 8082 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87370 vs 34464 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 | 855 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8082 | 16529 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34464 | 87370 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 24 | TU106 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 2 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 150 | 151 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2176 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 10.8 B |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8 pin |
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |