AMD Radeon PRO W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO W6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO W6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 2039 MHz vs 817 MHz
- Around 81% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1282 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 785 vs 590
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1282 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 vs 590 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 153.8 GTexel/s vs 111.4 GTexel/s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13298 vs 8112
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79133 vs 34464
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 153.8 GTexel/s vs 111.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13298 vs 8112 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79133 vs 34464 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO W6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | 590 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8112 | 13298 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34464 | 79133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 328.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3384.051 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 972.722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1824 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO W6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA106 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 151 | 148 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1282 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2039 MHz | 817 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | 9.846 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | 61.54 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 153.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |