AMD Radeon Pro W6600X vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600X and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 2068 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 2479 MHz vs 1647 MHz
- 2309.3x more texture fill rate: 317.3 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67420 vs 39050
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 2068 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2479 MHz vs 1647 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 317.3 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67420 vs 39050 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6600X | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67420 | 39050 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10687 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 103 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 103 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6600X | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 23 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 299 | 296 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2479 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 158.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 317.3 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11060 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | Apple MPX | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |