AMD Radeon RX 6500M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 832 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 153.6 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- 2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 1024
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 386 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7533 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39298 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 17 Dec 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 295 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1155 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 832 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 307.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.830 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.915 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 76.80 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |