AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D500 and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,227 gflops vs 2,169 gflops
- Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17885 vs 11444
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.776 vs 31.318
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.081 vs 681.141
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.568 vs 3.062
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.789 vs 32.922
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 17 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops vs 2,169 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17885 vs 11444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 vs 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 vs 681.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 vs 3.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 vs 32.922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 90.37 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 274 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 6020
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 6020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 90.37 GTexel / s vs 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 274 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6288 vs 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6288 vs 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro D500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17885 | 11444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | 31.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | 681.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | 3.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | 32.922 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | 6288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.311 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro D500 | NVIDIA Quadro K5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | GK104 |
| Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 17 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 668 | 669 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
| Price now | $1,950 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.47 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | 2,169 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s | 90.37 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | 172.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
