AMD FirePro M5950 vs ATI FirePro V7800
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M5950 and ATI FirePro V7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 307
- 24.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1528 vs 63
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 26 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 vs 63 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V7800
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1440 vs 480
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 vs 1314
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4894 vs 1279
- 12.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.084 vs 1.199
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 vs 323.699
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.448 vs 0.535
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 vs 16.137
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 vs 66.638
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 vs 1528
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 vs 1314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4894 vs 1279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.084 vs 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 vs 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.448 vs 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 vs 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 vs 66.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 vs 1528 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5950
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M5950 | ATI FirePro V7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 | 2028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1279 | 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.199 | 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 323.699 | 1124.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.535 | 1.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.137 | 39.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.638 | 181.538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 | 63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M5950 | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Whistler | Cypress |
Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 26 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 996 | 997 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $759 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 1440 |
Texture fill rate | 17.4 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |