AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs AMD FirePro M5950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275 and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 8.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 1135
- 23.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 1.199
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 0.535
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 16.137
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 66.638
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 vs 4 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 vs 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 vs 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 vs 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 vs 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 vs 66.638 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1314 vs 1115
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 569
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 323.699 vs 313.463
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1162
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1717
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1162
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1717
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1314 vs 1115 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 vs 569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 323.699 vs 313.463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 vs 1162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1717 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M275 | AMD FirePro M5950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1115 | 1314 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | 574 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9231 | 1135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.064 | 1.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.463 | 323.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.206 | 0.535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.381 | 16.137 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.685 | 66.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1162 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1717 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1162 | 2590 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1717 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M275 | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Venus | Whistler |
Launch date | 28 January 2014 | 4 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1005 | 1007 |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 37 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 716 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 57 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |