AMD FirePro W5100 vs AMD FirePro M5100

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5100 and AMD FirePro M5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 44.64 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,428 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2989 vs 2103
• Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11644 vs 6773
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.15 vs 22.202
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 vs 537.558
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.199 vs 2.245
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 vs 40.642
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.258 vs 108.052
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4397 vs 2926
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4397 vs 2926

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100

• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 537
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3688
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3688

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2989 2103
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	537 800
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11644 6773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.15 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	838.518 537.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.199 2.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.354 40.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	163.258 108.052
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4397 2926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358

Compare specifications (specs)