AMD FirePro W600 vs NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W600 and NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 335.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1676 vs 5
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 194
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 June 2012 vs 19 February 2002 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1676 vs 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 194 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W600 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1676 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.116 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3250 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2331 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1555 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3250 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W600 | NVIDIA Quadro4 900 XGL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kelvin |
Code name | Cape Verde | NV25 A2 |
Launch date | 13 June 2012 | 19 February 2002 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 919 | 916 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 768.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 63 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
Length | 163 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |