NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs AMD FirePro W600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and AMD FirePro W600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 50% better floating-point performance: 1,155 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2519 vs 1676
• Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9754 vs 6185
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 17.708
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 1.857
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 36.592
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 93.116
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 2331
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1555
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3250
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 2331
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1555
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3250

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W600

• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 225
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.463 vs 388.248

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2519 1676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	225 586
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9754 6185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.761 17.708
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	388.248 585.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.428 1.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.889 36.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.016 93.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3817 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 1555
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3250
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3817 2331
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 1555
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3250

Compare specifications (specs)