AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD FireStream 9170 and ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9170
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 12.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1450 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 647 vs 137
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 November 2007 vs 24 January 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 12.8 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1450 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 vs 137 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 105 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 vs 493 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FireStream 9170
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD FireStream 9170 | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 507 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 647 | 137 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FireStream 9170 | ATI Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale | R500 |
| Code name | RV670 | R580 |
| Launch date | 8 November 2007 | 24 January 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 321 | 322 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 512.0 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.8 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 666 million | 384 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 46.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
