AMD ROG Ally Extreme vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of AMD ROG Ally Extreme and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1120 MHz
  • 19343.3x more texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 6.7 billion / sec
  • 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
  • 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz
Launch date 13 Jun 2023 vs 3 September 2010
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 1120 MHz
Texture fill rate 129.6 GTexel/s vs 6.7 billion / sec
Pipelines 768 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 30 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 30 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Name AMD ROG Ally Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 469
PassMark - G3D Mark 519
PassMark - G2D Mark 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 1872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 690

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD ROG Ally Extreme NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 3.0 Fermi
Code name Phoenix GF108
Launch date 13 Jun 2023 3 September 2010
Place in performance rating 1568 1570
Type Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2700 MHz
Compute units 12
Core clock speed 1500 MHz 1120 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 96
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 129.6 GTexel/s 6.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 25390 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 215.04 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 21 mm, 0.8 inches
Length 280 mm, 11 inches
Supplementary power connectors None
Width 111 mm, 4.4 inches
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 API
OpenCL 2.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 51.20 GB/s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective 800 MHz
Memory type LPDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus