AMD Radeon 520 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 955 MHz
- 1000x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 865 vs 596
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 5874
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1182 vs 1155
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1182 vs 1155
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2691
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2691
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 955 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs vs 659.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 vs 596 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 5874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2691 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 203
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1850 vs 1242
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1850 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 203 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1850 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1850 vs 1242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 | 596 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 5874 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 1850 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2691 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Exo |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series |
| GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1109 | 926 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Compute units | 5 | 5 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 955 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | 659.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 520 with others
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 440-SE
AMDRadeon 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 Ultra
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
AMDRadeon 520 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon 520 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
