AMD Radeon 520 vs AMD Radeon R7 M440
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 520 and AMD Radeon R7 M440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1021 MHz
- 1008.8x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 660 GFLOPs vs 653.4 gflops
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 170
- 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 5598
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2537
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2537
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 1021 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs vs 653.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 170 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 5598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2537 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 865
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1935 vs 1182
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1935 vs 1182
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2067 vs 1242
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2067 vs 1242
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 vs 1182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 vs 1242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 vs 1242 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M440
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 865 | 897 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 170 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 | 5598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1182 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1182 | 1935 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1242 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1242 | 2067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 2537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 2537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 520 | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Meso |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1109 | 1112 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1021 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | 653.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 4.10 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 4 | |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 20.42 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||

