AMD Radeon 530 Mobile vs Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 Mobile and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 24.5 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
- 15.7x better floating-point performance: 784.1 gflops vs 50 gflops
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 3 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.5 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 20 |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops vs 50 gflops |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1021 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1021 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
Name | AMD Radeon 530 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530 Mobile | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Topaz | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 3 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1359 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 50 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 24.5 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |