AMD Radeon 530X Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 560
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530X Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 58.05 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,858 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.05 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops vs 784.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560
Name | AMD Radeon 530X Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530X Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Topaz | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 628 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 907 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 24.5 GTexel / s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 81.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |