AMD Radeon 530X vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530X and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 601 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28019 vs 5326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 601 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28019 vs 5326 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 784.1 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Texture fill rate | 48.08 GTexel / s vs 24.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops vs 784.1 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 530X | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28019 | 5326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1961 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.054 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 544.601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.46 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.553 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3855 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 530X | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Meso | GK104 |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 842 | 845 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 601 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 24.5 GTexel / s | 48.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan |