AMD Radeon 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 vs 6670
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3321
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 vs 6670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- 1036.7x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 936x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 6 Gbps
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 421 vs 249
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2722 vs 1395
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2355
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2355
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 1726
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 1726
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 6 Gbps |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 vs 249 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2722 vs 1395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 2355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 vs 1726 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 249 | 421 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1395 | 2722 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 6670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 3798 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 3798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 540 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Topaz | GK106 |
| Design | AMD Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 875 | 878 |
| Type | Notebook | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | 1,244 gflops |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 768 | |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 134.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6 Gbps | 5616 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 540 with others
AMDRadeon 540 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon 540 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon 540 vs
AppleM2 8-core
