AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon E9171 MCM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon 620

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
630.1x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s

Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 3 October 2017
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
6.7x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)

Core clock speed	1124 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Name	AMD Radeon 620	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1116
PassMark - G2D Mark	205
PassMark - G3D Mark	897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		27.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		924.953
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		52.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		97.705

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 620	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	Polaris 24	Lexa
Launch date	13 May 2019	3 October 2017
Place in performance rating	1248	1187
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1219 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1124 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	512
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	1550 million	2,200 million
Floating-point performance		1,248 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	6000 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5