AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GRID K180Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GRID K180Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 1807.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1201
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1201
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 113
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 934 vs 534
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1201 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 113 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 vs 534 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K180Q
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1744 vs 694
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1744 vs 694
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2688 vs 1116
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2688 vs 1116
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2688 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2688 vs 1116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K180Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1201 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 2688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 2688 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 113 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 534 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GRID K180Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1249 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 28.51 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1782 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |

