AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel UHD Graphics 600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 680M and Intel UHD Graphics 600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 680M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 10x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 64x more pipelines: 768 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 26.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26608 vs 1004
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 11 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 vs 1004 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 680M
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 600
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 680M | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 378 | 0 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26608 | 1004 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 318 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.952 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.77 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.427 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1701 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 476 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1000 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1701 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 680M | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Rembrandt | Gemini Lake GT1 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 11 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1232 | 1624 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 750 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.758 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.379 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Transistor count | 13100 million | 189 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |