AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 60% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 779.5 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 779.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350
Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | AMD Radeon R7 M350 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5897 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Meso |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1187 | 1190 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 24.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |