Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon E9171 MCM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

Intel UHD Graphics

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt

Launch date	21 Aug 2019 vs 3 October 2017
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 40 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 28.80
2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.321 vs 23.059
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 313.603
Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.345
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 19.728
3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 28.67

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s vs 28.80
Pipelines	512 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.321 vs 23.059
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	924.953 vs 313.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.499 vs 1.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	52.632 vs 19.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.705 vs 28.67

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

23.059

27.321

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

313.603

924.953

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.345

2.499

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.728

52.632

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

28.67

97.705

Name	Intel UHD Graphics	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.059	27.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	313.603	924.953
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.345	2.499
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.728	52.632
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	28.67	97.705
PassMark - G2D Mark	269
PassMark - G3D Mark	1477

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics	AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Code name	Comet Lake GT2	Lexa
Launch date	21 Aug 2019	3 October 2017
Place in performance rating	1186	1187
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1219 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	192	512
Texture fill rate	28.80	39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Core clock speed		1124 MHz
Floating-point performance		1,248 gflops
Transistor count		2,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		96 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		6000 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5