AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 4.9x more core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 230 MHz
- 21.2x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 1.84 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 64 MB
- 15.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 380 MHz
Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 30 August 2001 |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 230 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 1.84 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Lexa | R200 |
Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 30 August 2001 |
Place in performance rating | 1226 | 1223 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 230 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 1.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 60 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 6.08 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |