AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9171 MCM and NVIDIA GeForce 930M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 928 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 73% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.321 vs 22.344
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 924.953 vs 166.907
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.499 vs 1.225
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.632 vs 19.899
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.705 vs 84.246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 October 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 928 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 941 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 22.58 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 vs 22.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 vs 166.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 vs 1.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 vs 19.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 vs 84.246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 40 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9171 MCM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | NVIDIA GeForce 930M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.321 | 22.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 924.953 | 166.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.499 | 1.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.632 | 19.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.705 | 84.246 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1014 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5144 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon E9171 MCM | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Lexa | GM108 |
| Launch date | 3 October 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1226 | 1227 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1124 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 22.58 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon E9171 MCM with others
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
AMDRadeon E9171 MCM vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 940
