AMD Radeon HD 6470M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6470M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.5x more pipelines: 160 vs 64
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 208 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 107 vs 47
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.282 vs 0.465
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1251 vs 127
- 9.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1251 vs 127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 21 February 2008 |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 64 |
| Floating-point performance | 224 gflops vs 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 107 vs 47 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.282 vs 0.465 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 vs 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 487 vs 227
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1881
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1881
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 487 vs 227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 1881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 1881 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 227 | 487 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 107 | 47 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.282 | 0.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.819 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.671 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 | 3161 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 | 127 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 | 3161 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6470M | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Seymour | G94 |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 21 February 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $569.99 | $179 |
| Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1586 |
| Price now | $569.99 | $39.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | 23.72 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 224 gflops | 208 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 64 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 96 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6470M with others
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIANVS 310
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8470 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 505 OEM
