AMD Radeon HD 6470M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6470M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6470M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 224 gflops vs 144 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 790 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 227 vs 215
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 107 vs 45
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1881 vs 1686
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1881 vs 1686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 vs 26 January 2010 |
| Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 224 gflops vs 144 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 790 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 227 vs 215 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 107 vs 45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 vs 1686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 vs 1686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 735
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 vs 735 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6470M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6470M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 227 | 215 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 107 | 45 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 735 | 5892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.282 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 112.819 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.276 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.671 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1881 | 1686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 589 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1251 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1881 | 1686 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6470M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Seymour | G94 |
| Launch date | 4 January 2011 | 26 January 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $569.99 | $79.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1583 | 1584 |
| Price now | $569.99 | $79.99 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 0.72 | 5.72 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1360 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 224 gflops | 144 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 5.6 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 58 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 790 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6470M with others
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 220
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIANVS 310
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8470 OEM
AMDRadeon HD 6470M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 505 OEM
