AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 5x more pipelines: 320 vs 64
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 283.52 gflops vs 169.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 136 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 vs 1 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 320 vs 64 |
Floating-point performance | 283.52 gflops vs 169.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 443 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 7.09 GTexel / s
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 555 vs 337
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2414 vs 1614
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2414 vs 1614
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 443 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 7.09 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 555 vs 337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 vs 1614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 vs 1614 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 337 | 555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 136 | 57 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 882 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 733 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1104 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1104 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1614 | 2414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1614 | 2414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6530D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | BeaverCreek | G94 |
Launch date | 20 June 2011 | 1 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1465 | 1467 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 443 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 283.52 gflops | 169.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 7.09 GTexel / s | 16 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,450 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 254 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |