AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2 and NVIDIA Quadro 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 34.8x more texture fill rate: 2x 50.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 46.7x more pipelines: 2x 1120 vs 48
- 37.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,016.0 gflops vs 108 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 1540 MHz
| Launch date | 8 July 2011 vs 5 April 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 50.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1120 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,016.0 gflops vs 108 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 1540 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 400
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 400
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro 400 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 148 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4630 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1103 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro 400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Barts | GT216 |
| Launch date | 8 July 2011 | 5 April 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $520 | $169 |
| Place in performance rating | 1613 | 1614 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $145.55 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.13 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,016.0 gflops | 108 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1120 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 50.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 7.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,700 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 304 mm | 163 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2x 134.4 GB / s | 12.32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz | 1540 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |