AMD Radeon HD 7730M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7730M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • 5.4x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
  • 6.4x more pipelines: 512 vs 80
  • 8.6x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 775 vs 181
  • 9.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.757 vs 7.489
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3220 vs 904
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1733
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3220 vs 904
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1733
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 April 2012 vs 7 January 2010
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 80
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 775 vs 181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.757 vs 7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3220 vs 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3220 vs 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 1733

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

  • 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 25 Watt
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 214
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7 Watt vs 25 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 330 vs 214

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7730M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
775
181
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
214
330
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
69.757
7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3220
904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3220
904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
1733
Name AMD Radeon HD 7730M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
PassMark - G3D Mark 775 181
PassMark - G2D Mark 214 330
Geekbench - OpenCL 6787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 289.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 25.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 69.757 7.489
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3220 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3220 904
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 1733

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 7730M ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Chelsea Park
Launch date 24 April 2012 7 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1154 1156
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 675 MHz
Core clock speed 575 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 80
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s 4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 7 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 292 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5?
Shared memory 0 0