NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs AMD Radeon HD 7730M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and AMD Radeon HD 7730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 675 MHz
• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1327 vs 763
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 246 vs 213
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 15.244
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1777
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 3220
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1777
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 3220

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6787 vs 4265
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.172 vs 251.09
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.524 vs 1.144
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.319 vs 10.872
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.757 vs 13.423

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1327 763
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	246 213
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4265 6787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.67 15.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	251.09 289.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.144 1.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.872 25.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.423 69.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2351 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3520 3220
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2351 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3520 3220
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3350

Compare specifications (specs)