AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 55x more texture fill rate: 2x 118.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 192
- 16.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,789 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 1536 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 31 August 2012 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 118.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,789 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 1536 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro CX
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 500 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.707 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 454 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | New Zealand | GT200B |
Launch date | 31 August 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $1,999 |
Place in performance rating | 321 | 315 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,789 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 118.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 500 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 292 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 3 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 264.0 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |