AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP vs AMD Radeon HD 7470M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP and AMD Radeon HD 7470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5751 vs 3322
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1422
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1422
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3074
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3074
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 September 2013 vs 7 January 2012
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5751 vs 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3074
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3074

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470M

  • Around 67% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
  • Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 25% higher pipelines: 160 vs 128
  • 2.1x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 408 vs 261
  • 5.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 393 vs 75
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 750 MHz vs 450 MHz
Texture fill rate 6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 160 vs 128
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 7 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 408 vs 261
PassMark - G2D Mark 393 vs 75

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
261
408
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
75
393
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5751
3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
1422
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3074
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3074
Name AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP AMD Radeon HD 7470M
PassMark - G3D Mark 261 408
PassMark - G2D Mark 75 393
Geekbench - OpenCL 5751 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 1422
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3074
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3074
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8280 IGP AMD Radeon HD 7470M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 TeraScale 2
Code name Kalindi Seymour
Launch date 18 September 2013 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1029 1032
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 450 MHz 750 MHz
Floating-point performance 115.2 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 128 160
Texture fill rate 3.6 GTexel / s 6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 7 Watt
Transistor count 1,178 million 370 million
Boost clock speed 800 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3 / GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Shared memory 0