AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 6350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 7 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 160 vs 80
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 280.0 gflops vs 104 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 263 vs 141
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 171
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.239 vs 0.154
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.365 vs 10.131
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 672 vs 381
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1078 vs 734
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2093 vs 1717
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 672 vs 381
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1078 vs 734
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2093 vs 1717
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 7 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 875 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops vs 104 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 vs 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 vs 0.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 vs 10.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 vs 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 vs 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 vs 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 vs 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 vs 1717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 872
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2872 vs 872 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6350
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 872 | 2872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.021 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.239 | 0.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.365 | 10.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 672 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1078 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2093 | 1717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 672 | 381 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1078 | 734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2093 | 1717 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8490 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 6350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Caicos | Cedar |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1541 | 1544 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | |
Price now | $50.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 280.0 gflops | 104 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 7 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |