AMD Radeon HD 8530M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8530M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8530M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Launch date 10 January 2014 vs 27 September 2013

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • 6.5x more texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s
  • 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
  • 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 537.6 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 10.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5255 vs 490
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 573 vs 438
  • Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2455
  • 93.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 39.6
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 915 MHz vs 650 MHz
Boost clock speed 980 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 109.8 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 384
Floating-point performance 2,634 gflops vs 537.6 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5255 vs 490
PassMark - G2D Mark 573 vs 438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 2455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 39.6

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8530M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
490
5255
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
438
573
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2455
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
39.6
3716
Name AMD Radeon HD 8530M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 490 5255
PassMark - G2D Mark 438 573
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2455 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 39.6 3716
Geekbench - OpenCL 14380
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1351.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 156.419
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8530M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Mars GK104
Launch date 10 January 2014 27 September 2013
Place in performance rating 583 585
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 700 MHz 980 MHz
Core clock speed 650 MHz 915 MHz
Floating-point performance 537.6 gflops 2,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 1344
Texture fill rate 16.8 GTexel / s 109.8 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 3,540 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 170 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5