NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon HD 8530M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon HD 8530M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 99% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 537.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 10.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5030 vs 490
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 438
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2455
- 93.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 39.6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 10 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 537.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5030 vs 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 2455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 39.6 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8530M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8530M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5030 | 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 39.6 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1810 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon HD 8530M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Mars |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 10 January 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 580 | 583 |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 700 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 537.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 16.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |