AMD Radeon HD 8550G vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8550G and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8550G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1234 vs 641
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1397 vs 1129
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1397 vs 1129
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2459 vs 2113
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2459 vs 2113
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2013 vs 14 January 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1234 vs 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1397 vs 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1397 vs 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2459 vs 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2459 vs 2113 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 515 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 400 vs 256
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 753
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 753
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 117
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 805 vs 412
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 515 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Pipelines | 400 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 753 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 753 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 117 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 805 vs 412 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8550G
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8550G | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1234 | 641 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 753 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 753 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1397 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1397 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2459 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2459 | 2113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 117 | 289 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 412 | 805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 184.557 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.319 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.627 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8550G | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Richland | Redwood |
Launch date | 12 March 2013 | 14 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1417 | 1420 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 720 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 515 MHz | 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 400 |
Floating-point performance | 620.0 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 400 | |
Texture fill rate | 15.5 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | |
Transistor count | 627 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |