AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 210 Watt
Launch date | 28 December 2013 vs 29 November 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 41.0 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 448 vs 384
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,311.7 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 41.0 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 448 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,311.7 gflops vs 648.2 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Name | AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 396 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10204 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1181.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.37 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 121.575 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2133 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4197 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Scrapper | GF110 |
Launch date | 28 December 2013 | 29 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 853 | 856 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 844 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 648.2 gflops | 1,311.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 20.26 GTexel / s | 41.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,303 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz |