AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 20% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 601 MHz
Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10204 vs 5525

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	28 December 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	720 MHz vs 601 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	10204 vs 5525

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

2.4x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
Around 78% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1961 vs 396
Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 259

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.08 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1961 vs 396
PassMark - G2D Mark	304 vs 259

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

396

1961

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

259

304

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10204

5525

Name	AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	396	1961
PassMark - G2D Mark	259	304
Geekbench - OpenCL	10204	5525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		4470

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Essentials
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Scrapper	GK104
Launch date	28 December 2013	1 June 2012
Place in performance rating	851	853
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	844 MHz
Core clock speed	720 MHz	601 MHz
Floating-point performance	648.2 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	960
Texture fill rate	20.26 GTexel / s	48.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,303 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		89.6 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2800 MHz
Shared memory		0