AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 601 MHz
  • Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10204 vs 5827
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 December 2013 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed 720 MHz vs 601 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10204 vs 5827

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

  • 2.4x more texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
  • Around 78% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1915 vs 396
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 298 vs 259
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 48.08 GTexel / s vs 20.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines 960 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,154 gflops vs 648.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1915 vs 396
PassMark - G2D Mark 298 vs 259

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
396
1915
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
259
298
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10204
5827
Name AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 396 1915
PassMark - G2D Mark 259 298
Geekbench - OpenCL 10204 5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4470

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8650D IGP NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 3 Kepler
Code name Scrapper GK104
Launch date 28 December 2013 1 June 2012
Place in performance rating 849 851
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 844 MHz
Core clock speed 720 MHz 601 MHz
Floating-point performance 648.2 gflops 1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 960
Texture fill rate 20.26 GTexel / s 48.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 1,303 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory type System Shared GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 89.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz
Shared memory 0