AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 722 MHz
- 1904.5x more texture fill rate: 132.0 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 556
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7144 vs 3568
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 722 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s vs 69.31 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 vs 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7144 vs 3568 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38680 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 | 556 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7144 | 3568 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 | NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 193 | 195 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 722 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 264.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.448 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.224 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 132.0 GTexel/s | 69.31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |