AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 813x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 18 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32370 vs 29347
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 7730
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3595
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 770 vs 599
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9771 vs 5978
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32370 vs 29347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3595 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 vs 599 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9771 vs 5978 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29347 | 32370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 10566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3338 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 599 | 770 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5978 | 9771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP106 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 18 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 365 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1708 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |