AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 992.1x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7730 vs 7062
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7730 vs 7062
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 599 vs 369
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5978 vs 4901
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 7 August 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 vs 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 vs 7062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 599 vs 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5978 vs 4901 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3595
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3595
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3350
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD FirePro S9050 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 7062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 6260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 13032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 13032 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 599 | 369 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5978 | 4901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 371 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 254 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |