AMD Radeon Pro 555X vs NVIDIA GRID K2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555X and NVIDIA GRID K2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 10581
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.283 vs 18.948
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 2.58
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 32.988
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 114.144
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2350 vs 344
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 312
- 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2350 vs 344
- 10.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 11 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 vs 10581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 vs 18.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 2.58 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 32.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 114.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 vs 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K2
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 768
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 vs 668.308
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 vs 4093
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 vs 4093
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 968.568 vs 668.308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6371 vs 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6371 vs 4093 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K2
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA GRID K2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 | 10581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.283 | 18.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 | 968.568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 | 2.58 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 | 32.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 | 114.144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2350 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 | 6371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2350 | 344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 312 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555X | NVIDIA GRID K2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 11 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 964 | 967 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s |