AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1704 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 852 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 852 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 June 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 588 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 852 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1704 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |