AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Around 39% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2944
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2944 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 13123
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 13123
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3715
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3715
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3357
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3357
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105219 vs 78565
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 vs 839
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 vs 13369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 23 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 vs 78565 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 vs 839 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 vs 13369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 6293 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78565 | 105219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 839 | 908 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13369 | 18750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Turing |
Code name | Vega 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | 23 June 2017 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 200 | 105 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 12500 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |