AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98432 vs 34851
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 9258
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 9258
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 662
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 7707
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 15 October 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 vs 34851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 662 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 7707 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 | 34851 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3351 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 662 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 7707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 160 | 335 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |