AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 885 MHz
Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1185 MHz
3.6x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99271 vs 76200
Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 470
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14018 vs 11550

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	Dec 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed	1574 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines	8192 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	99271 vs 76200
PassMark - G2D Mark	858 vs 470
PassMark - G3D Mark	14018 vs 11550

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

4.1x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 475 Watt
8.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 14208
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 14208
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3713
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3713
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3359
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 475 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	17328 vs 14208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	17328 vs 14208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8912 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8912 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8055 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8055 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

99271

76200

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14208

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14208

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

8055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

8055

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

858

470

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14018

11550

Name	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	99271	76200
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14208	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14208	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	8055
PassMark - G2D Mark	858	470
PassMark - G3D Mark	14018	11550
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1001.496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6789

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Turing
Code name	Vega 20	TU106
Launch date	Dec 2019	29 January 2019
Place in performance rating	177	180
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz	1185 MHz
Compute units	64
Core clock speed	1574 MHz	885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	14.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines	8192	2304
Pixel fill rate	110.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	440.3 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	475 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	13230 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	Dual-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB
Memory bandwidth	825.3 GB/s
Memory bus width	4096 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1612 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)