AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 371.6x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 20 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
- 2.5x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1408
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.417 vs 130.7
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4198.719 vs 2361.73
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.996 vs 13.641
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.069 vs 135.462
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 940.599 vs 774.974
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.417 vs 130.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4198.719 vs 2361.73 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.996 vs 13.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.069 vs 135.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 940.599 vs 774.974 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 205.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 4198.719 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 19.996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 218.069 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 940.599 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 206586 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP100 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 20 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $4,599 |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 124 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |